Mitt Romney corporations are people quote
Corporate responsibility

“Corporations are people,
my friend.”

A look at how corporate personhood was built — from the 14th Amendment to Citizens United — and the documentary that first put the whole system on trial.

1868
the 14th Amendment is ratified
1886
Santa Clara extends it to corporations
2010
Citizens United removes spending limits
Watch

The Corporation (2003)

Directed by Mark Achbar and Jennifer Abbott, based on Joel Bakan’s book The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power.

Directors: Mark Achbar, Jennifer Abbott Based on: Joel Bakan’s The Corporation Released: 2003

The film traces how corporate power grew into its modern form, drawing on interviews with executives, activists and scholars to examine what happens when profit motives outrun social responsibility. Its central argument runs through a single legal idea: corporate personhood, the doctrine that treats a corporation as a “person” entitled to many of the same legal rights as an individual.

Rather than treating that idea as neutral, the film traces its consequences — environmental harm, labor exploitation, and outsized political influence — and argues that voluntary corporate social responsibility can’t fix a structural problem. Its case for reform rests on real accountability and democratic oversight, not self-regulation.


How we got here

The legal history of corporate personhood

Three moments, over more than a century, built the doctrine the documentary puts on trial.

1868
14th Amendment,
U.S. Constitution

Life, Liberty, or Property (and Profits)

Ratified to guarantee due process and equal protection under the law, the 14th Amendment was written to address the injustices faced by formerly enslaved people and other marginalized groups. Its text never mentions corporations.

Finance and business imagery
1886
Santa Clara County v.
Southern Pacific Railroad

The turn toward corporate personhood

Corporate lawyers began arguing that corporations qualified as “persons” under the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court’s ruling in Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company held that corporations were entitled to equal protection under the law — the foundation everything since has built on.

Justice and law imagery
2010
Citizens United v.
Federal Election Commission

Unlimited political spending

The Supreme Court held that corporations have a First Amendment right to engage in political speech, including unlimited spending on political campaigns. It’s the decision that most entrenched corporate personhood in modern politics — and the one most cited in debates over money’s influence on democracy.

Citizens United case imagery

In the amendment’s own words

What the 14th actually says

XIV
Ratified 1868
“…nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
The debate today

What critics and defenders argue

Supporters say it enablesgrowth, investment, jobs
Critics say it enablesreduced accountability
Central 2010 rulingCitizens United v. FEC
Rights extended1st & 14th Amendment
“Corporations are people, my friend.”
Willard “Mitt” Romney, 2012 campaign

Let’s create together

Understanding how corporate power was built is the first step toward holding it accountable. Explore the rest of our causes to see where the work continues.

See all causes →
Sustainable Action Now — Corporate Responsibility. Cherry Hill, New Jersey.