Voting rights, current through 2026 — and what’s coming in 2028.
Redistricting fights, a Supreme Court ruling that just reshaped the Voting Rights Act, and a federal voter-ID push that’s failed in the Senate five times so far. Here’s where things actually stand.
The SAVE America Act, and the executive order behind it
The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote and photo ID to cast a federal ballot. It’s the central voting-policy fight of the 2026 cycle.
The House passed its version 218-213 in early 2026, almost entirely along party lines. In the Senate, it needs 60 votes to overcome a filibuster; Republicans hold 53 seats, and the bill has now failed multiple cloture votes, including a narrower photo-ID-only version that fell short 52-48 just before the Senate’s August 2026 recess. Four Republican senators have joined Democrats in opposition at various points. Leadership has said they intend to bring it back for another vote when the Senate reconvenes in September.
Separately, President Trump signed Executive Order 14399 on March 31, 2026, directing the Election Assistance Commission to require documentary citizenship proof (such as a passport) on the federal voter registration form, and tying certain federal election funding to state compliance. This followed an earlier March 2025 version of the same push, which a federal court permanently enjoined in January 2026.
Supporters argue documentary proof of citizenship and photo ID protect election integrity and public trust, and that requiring them is a reasonable, widely-supported baseline — polling cited by supporters puts public support for voter ID in the 70-80% range.
Opponents — including election law scholars and voting rights groups — argue noncitizen voting is vanishingly rare in verified cases, that many eligible citizens (particularly married women who changed their name, renters, seniors, and rural and lower-income voters) lack ready access to the required documents, and that implementing sweeping changes this close to an election creates its own risk of disenfranchisement.
Louisiana v. Callais and the mid-decade map wars
A Supreme Court ruling on a Louisiana congressional map has already reshaped redistricting fights in Texas, Missouri, North Carolina, and California — with consequences that reach well past this year’s midterms.
In a 6-3 decision written by Justice Samuel Alito, the Court held that Louisiana’s use of race as a factor in drawing a second Black-opportunity congressional district was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. In practice, the ruling makes it substantially harder for voters of color to challenge redistricting plans under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act on the grounds that a map dilutes their electoral power — the primary tool used for decades to contest exactly this kind of map.
Separately, and under direct political pressure to shore up the House majority ahead of the midterms, Texas, Missouri, and North Carolina redrew their congressional maps mid-decade — a break from the usual once-a-decade schedule tied to the census. California responded with Proposition 50, a ballot measure voters approved in November 2025 authorizing a new, Democratic-favorable map of its own.
A trial court had found Texas’s new map deliberately targeted the seats of five Black and Latino members of Congress; the Supreme Court granted the state a stay allowing the map’s use in 2026 regardless, while the underlying case continues. Commentators across the political spectrum agree the Callais ruling’s largest effects will play out beyond this cycle, as more Republican-controlled state legislatures gain freer rein to redraw maps ahead of the 2028 elections without the Voting Rights Act challenge that used to constrain them.
What’s actually true about the 2020 election
Separate from the live 2026 policy debates above, this is empirically settled: multiple independent, bipartisan reviews found no evidence of the widespread fraud claimed after the 2020 election. It’s useful context any time similar claims resurface.
A bipartisan list of federal intelligence officials, judges, and elected officials, many of them Republicans, who rejected fraud claims.
A comprehensive rundown from the nonpartisan fact-checker rating specific claims by elected officials.
Election scholars examined the statistics-based arguments used to cast doubt on the results.
Multiple analytical approaches found no evidence of fraud, manipulation, or uncorrected error.
A GOP-commissioned report concluded Michigan’s vote count showed no widespread or systemic fraud.
An ongoing tracker of every case disputing the 2020 results and how each was decided.
Get ready to vote in 2026
Whatever happens with SAVE America Act or state-level ID requirements between now and November, these steps are worth doing regardless.
Register to vote
You can pre-register before 18 in nearly every state; North Dakota has no registration at all.
Register →Confirm your registration
Worth checking even if you’re sure you’re registered — roll purges and address changes happen.
Check status →Check your state’s ID rules
Requirements vary by state right now, independent of the federal fight above.
See requirements →See which states count most
Competitive districts and states carry outsized weight in a midterm.
Check your state →

